Tuesday, November 20, 2018

Books and Social Media

I am going to try to post here at least once a week. I may not always succeed in that goal because sometimes I just don't have anything to say. Today, though, I want to talk about social media and books and the options available for sharing and discovering.

I have a Goodreads account. I have had one since before they were purchased by that giant behemoth in Seattle. I want to have a different option, and I do have "memberships" on LibraryThing, Riffle, Litsy, and Edelweiss, but none of them offer what GR does. LibraryThing is aesthetically unappealing and not easy to navigate, which doesn't make it easy to discover new-to-me books. Riffle is pretty, but it doesn't have a lot of users and the focus seems to be more on e-books than paper books. Which is fine, it's just not me as a reader. Litsy (which is now owned by LibraryThing) is basically what you would get if you pulled out the #bookstagram community from Instagram and gave them their own app. It's very visually-focused and not really geared toward reviewing. With Edelweiss, it's very clear that the social aspect was an add-on and wasn't (still isn't) a primary focus, which is fine, because that's not my primary focus in using it, either. It has been suggested that I employ a spreadsheet to track my reading, but that's not easily shareable, nor is it a tool for discovery. There just isn't anything out there that I've found that ticks all of my boxes.

What, then, would my ideal book tracking, sharing, and discovery tool look like?


  • It would not be owned by Amazon, which should probably go without saying, but I'm saying it anyway.
  • Nor would it be owned by a publisher or bookstore that would try to sell me things through it or use my reviews to try to sell things to other people.
  • It would have a feed, much like the one on Goodreads.
  • It would allow me to make my reviews viewable only to my friends.
  • It would allow me to easily share my reviews to other social media platforms.
  • It would have a rating system that allowed for fractions or decimals, so that a book that fell in between two ratings could be denoted as such.
  • It would have different channels for the public and bloggers and book professionals. Or, and this may make me sound like a snobby arse, it would be open to book professionals only: booksellers, librarians, publishers, authors, etc. The reason for this is that I read a lot of Young Adult and I just can't deal with the plethora of GIF "reviews" and exclamation points and hating on a book before one has even read it that happens in the online YA-reading community. (Also known as: I'm old. Get off my lawn!)
  • This is kind of a unicorn, but I am talking ideals here, so here it is: It wouldn't allow one to review a book one hasn't read. I don't know how it would be possible to verify this, but I'd love to see at least some effort made. It would eliminate at least some of the "OMG! Look at that cover! I CAN'T WAIT! Here's a GIF from a CW TV Show to show how happy I am!" and the "So and so is a cis-het, able-bodied, neurotypical white person who should not ever, ever be allowed to write about any characters who are not exactly like them and, therefore, this book is terrible and we should kill it with fire. No, I haven't read it yet, but I know it's the absolute worst."
  • It would have a recommendation engine that wasn't just based on "People who read and liked this, also read and liked this." I get recommendations from Goodreads that make zero sense. Just because I enjoyed this Kids Graphic Novel does not mean that I would also enjoy that Erotic Shifter Novella (or vice versa) even if someone else liked both of those things.
  • It would focus primarily on user interaction. Newsletters and author interviews are all well and good, but they don't influence my reading nearly as much as what my bookish coterie are reading and enjoying and recommending.
  • It would allow the formation of groups so that I could hang out and talk Romance with my other friends who are Romance readers without my whole update feed being that conversation and boring my non-Romance-reading friends.
  • It would look good and be easy to navigate. Keep the interface clean and uncluttered, but a little more fancy than text-only. And if I could customize my homepage, that would be ideal.
  • And, finally, if I could easily link to IndieBound or an independent bookstore for anyone who wants to buy the book, that would be amazing.
I guess, in the end, I want Goodreads and Edelweiss (and a little Facebook) to have a baby that only had the best features of each of them. If you have the skills and the time and the inclination and want to make this happen for me, I will bake something for you.

Monday, November 12, 2018

This Is All Cynthia's Fault

I thought I was done with this thing. For four years, I let it lie fallow and thought of it rarely, if ever. And then a friend of mine wanted to know more about my 50 States/50 Romances reading challenge, but she doesn't (and won't, for very, very good reasons) use Goodreads. I've been posting about the challenge in a private Facebook group, but trying to find old posts on FB is not easy. So, here I am again, sharing my bookish (and maybe, occasionally, bake-ish) thoughts and adventures and disappointments.

Since I came back to this because of curiosity about my 50 States/50 Romances challenge, I suppose that's as good a place to start as any.

Back in March or April of this year, I created a project for myself: I was going to read one Romance novel set in each of the 50 states, and I was going to read them alphabetically by state. I finished the first book—Something to Prove by Kimberly Lang—on April 15th and have averaged about one book for the challenge per month. None of the books so far have been great. Or, at least, none of the books so far have been great for me. I am, by nature, a reader of Historical Romance and only one of the books I've read for this challenge so far has been an Historical. And it was an Old Skool Johanna Lindsey, so it was far from the best the sub-genre has to offer. But, part of the impetus behind this challenge was to get me reading books I wouldn't otherwise have chosen for myself.

Here, then, are the books I've read for the challenge thus far. I've tried to include some thoughts about the books in question, but it's been long enough since I've read most of them that I only remember broad strokes, so the details are very sparse.

Alabama Something to Prove by Kimberly Lang: I started off with a small town contemporary. I liked it okay, especially since the author didn't feel the need to create a Big Villain to provide conflict. It was just small people being small who stood in the way of Happily Ever After for the hero and heroine.

Alaska The Royal Treatment by MaryJanice Davidson: A kind of alternate universe setting where Alaska has a royal family. There were some good humorous set pieces, but some of the world building was questionable.

Arizona Fairyville by Emma Holly: When I started, I vaguely remembered reading this one when I was going through a period of reading a lot of Paranormal Romance. It's on the steamier side and is about a polyamorous relationship, but it occasionally felt like the focus on the sexy bits took away from the plot and the actual emotional development of the relationship.

Arkansas Wild Child by Molly O'Keefe: Another small town contemporary, this one about a prodigal daughter returning to her childhood home. It wants to be angsty and edgy and it is more of those things than some other novels, but the edginess felt more forced than natural or realistic.

California About That Kiss by Jill Shalvis: Shalvis is one of the few authors of contemporaries who is almost an auto-read for me, so I enjoyed this one more than a lot of the others on this list so far. That being said, though, her Heartbreaker Bay series (of which this is #7) is not my favorite of hers. It's enjoyable, but a little cookie-cutter.

Colorado This Gun for Hire by Jo Goodman: I like this one more in retrospect than I did just after I finished it. It features a female bounty hunter hired to protect a miner's daughter and the Army cavalryman who hires her for the job. The relationship between the two was great and the supporting characters were more than just props or plot devices, but the resolution to the external danger they face just didn't quite work for me.

Connecticut Gentle Rogue by Johanna Lindsey: This is a 2005 re-issue of a book originally published back in 1990 and has some issues, as a lot of Romance novels from the 80s and 90s do. When I was younger and didn't know any better, I devoured Lindsey's novels in all their Fabio-covered glory. Reading one now only made me realize how far the genre has come.

Delaware Cure for the Common Breakup by Beth Kendrick: This is as far as I've gotten in my quest. This was fine and would be a good addition to a beach bag, but the characters seemed to change their attitudes/outlooks/personalities because they needed to do so for plot reasons and not because they put the work in to grow and change. There was also some medical/healing stuff that was seriously questionable. It is, however, fairly "clean," so would be a good recommendation for readers who don't want all the swearing and explicit sex.


There you have it. The seven books I've managed to read so far for my 50 States, 50 Romances challenge. I'll add new blog posts for each new book I read for this project. I'll also occasionally post about other books I love or loathe, but not about the ones that are just okay. I also listen to a lot of audiobooks, so I may do a post or two about the ones that I think are really worth a listen. I'm baking a lot right now, so I may share some of that here, too. Of course, there's an equal chance that I'll get bored or distracted by shiny objects and let this die again.